A new era of particle physics is about to begin with the construction
of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hadrons can be described as combinations of quarks. Generally speaking,
hadrons comprise all particles that are affected by the strong nuclear
force[CD91, p.51]. Protons are one of
about 100 different hadrons that are known today. Particles that are
not affected by the strong force are called leptons
(e.g. electron, muon). Protons are roughly 2000 times heavier than electrons,
thus contain more energy and are more likely to produce new massive particles
that theorists predict, but have not been ``seen'' yet. Furthermore ![]()
collisions are essentially interactions between the enclosed quarks, thus
allowing for very basic interactions. However, there are disadvantages
with observing such interactions:
as the collisions are not ``clean'' when bunches of protons
hit each other, there is a lot of background information that has to be
subtracted before the interesting event can be studied. This
background consists of protons that did not collide as well as collision
products of protons that did not hit each other with the full
energy. Finally,
as particle collisions will produce several different new products there
is a huge amount of newly created ones, that are not wanted for a
specific experiment. This makes the building of a data acquisition
system much more difficult than for an experiment that has to observe
clean lepton interactions.
In order to get an impression of the task that a data acquisition system
has to carry out, let's have a closer look at the amounts of data that are
fed into the system. The most interesting parameter is the rate at
which particles collide. This
reaction rate
is proportional to the particle flux
of
beam
, to the cross section
of the target particle
and the number
of particles in the target[MRRS88, p. 58]
(i.e. the bunch of particles in the second beam
):
| (1) |
The expression
is called luminosity and serves
as a proportionality factor for the event
rate[MRRS88, p. 59][PRSZ95, p. 44]. The flux
is given
by the number of particles in a bunch and the frequency at which these bunches
pass the interaction region divided by the target area[PRSZ95, p. 42]:
| (2) |
is the number of particles in a bunch of beam
,
gives the
frequency at which bunches pass the interaction region.
and
characterise the Gaussian transverse beam profiles
in horizontal and vertical directions. For the luminosity
we
get therefore the equation[ED98, p. 138]:
| (3) |
From the LHC key parameters in table 3 we can calculate
:

The cross section
of a particle can be interpreted as the size[Gri87, p.190] that it represents to a stream of other incoming
particles. When a particle is a solid sphere then its cross section will
be the area given by its circumfence. For a ``soft'' particle, like
a proton that manifests itself by a Coulomb potential
that decreases with
distance from the protons centre, the case is different:
The distance from the centre of the particle at which another particle hits
is called impact parameter. The angle at which a colliding particle
is deflected at the target is called the scattering angle. The smaller
the impact parameter, the larger the scattering angle. At a certain distance
from the centre this angle will be close to zero and thus gives a
limit to the
effective area. The cross section of a particle
depends on the kind of particles involved in the interaction and of
the particles potentials, i.e. their energies[PRSZ95, pp.190]. Cross
sections are given in barn (1 barn =
).
For a
interaction we can look up the cross section for LHC
energies in studies (see figure 6 for a fit to existing
measurements). At a collision energy of 7 TeV per particle beam the
cross section is about 100 mb. With this value we can continue our
event rate calculation:
As there are
time between two bunch crossings we have
bunch
crossings per second. So, each bunch crossing contains roughly
interactions.
For the
cross sections plotted against energy (figure
6) there are no real measurements yet, just fits. Therefore
the event rate as well as the number of interactions per bunch crossing
must not be seen as definitive values. They represent orders of magnitude
for understanding the problems that arise when studying new physics processes.
The high event rate of
forces us to reduce the amount of data
and select the interesting events. Some tens
of interactions per bunch crossing indicate that it is indeed difficult to
find the created particles that shall be stored for later analysis.
They are hidden by an enormous background of other particles and
slower decaying debris from earlier interactions.